Skip to main content

"Our scars have the power to remind us that the past was real."

Bonhomie.

So much of it wafts through the market air currently. Hannibal Lecter’s quote from Red Dragon in the subject line wells up in one’s head. (Though some would counsel against letting Dr. Lecter crawl into one’s brains.)


The past decade has seen a major change in the way market participants think about positioning. Like a responsible parent helping toddlers to get on their feet, central banks globally have held the market’s hands through periods of disquiet. We have learnt to walk, indeed. Conditioning has nudged us to presume the parent’s omnipresence during future periods of turmoil. Assorted naysayers, bear mongers have been shaken out. Converts and survivors from The Resistance have taken to trend following, along the path of least resistance. Up. Momentum plays on liquidity – the ETF brigade – have added to the crowd. The zigging and zagging of prices – Volatility – has progressively entered hibernation, as a result.


QUIETER...and QUIETER



Volatility tends to bear an inverse relationship with prices. It also tends to cluster together. As prices have gone up, volatility has gone to sleep. The low volatility regime of the present day is a result of several factors. Low interest rate regimes globally, central bank parenting, rise of ETFs. Conditioning has pushed some of the adventurous to making open bets against market downturn. Underlying presumption being a continued upward trend in prices. Helpful global central banks are in U-turn mode from their easy money stance. Interest rates have U-turned as well. The rise of the volatility sphinx has been proclaimed before. But central banks have repeatedly drowned out callers’ tunes. Though low by historical standards, a lift-off of interest rates from the zero bound has the potential to trigger quick price reversals. With no real experience with this ogre over the past decade, we may have occasion to remember Hannibal Lecter soon.   


INDIA: THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT…..ISN’T IT?

There is little to not like here. Financial savings wave, systemic clean up, and a government that plays the adoring parent’s role. Demonetisation categorically resolved the debate around competing investment avenues. Real estate and gold has receded from minds. Falling bond yields pushed fixed income out of market mindshare. Leaving the only game in town: equities. Indians have latched on and how. Domestic investors poured more capital into equity than the 2006-16 period combined. Many of these are first-timers entering the equity market in a meaningful manner. With a preference for smaller-sized companies. This group has had little experience with either volatility, or a large market drawdown. Meanwhile, interest rates have been quietly inching higher.


THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM AT THE BOTTOM



The average small cap index drawdown over a 1-year period has been -30% historically. The post-DeMo new investor group has never had to confront deep valleys before. A low volatility world combined with no drawdown experience makes this group particularly vulnerable to sharp downturns.

…which, one is led to believe, will be bid into with confidence.

The easy money of 2017 is likely history. Scars could remind us, yet again, that the past was real. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange Life of Abraham de Moivre

This edition is about a topic that fascinates me: bidding behaviour.   On how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. And the notion of ‘rationality’.   *****  Many of you participated in a game I played with you recently. (I’m sure you are glad that I didn’t ask you to predict your expiry dates!)   An investment prospect offers 100% return potential over your benchmark return (your ‘required return’). How much of this excess return would you be willing to pay/share upfront to participate in the idea? There were no right answers for this ‘buy in’. Only interesting answers.   Chart time. Buyin for ‘50%’ represents 50% and above.     Participants comprised of finance and non-finance backgrounds. The left bins generally had finance people; who opted for some variant of upfront fee and profit share structures. Many non-finance guys populated the higher bins. Interestingly, several finance folks populated the 50% and above bin. And I had s

Halls of the Blind

I can see what you see not Vision milky, then eyes rot. When you turn, they will be gone, Whispering their hidden song. Then you see what cannot be Shadows move where light should be. Out of darkness, out of mind, Cast down into the Halls of the Blind.  - Diablo I usually avoid referring to stuff from the 90s as the opening act. It risks giving away my vintage… But the above words from one of the most successful role-playing games from the 90s – Diablo – (who remembers it?) is apt for this edition. Auditor Problems. It’s an opportune moment to dive into the Corporate Halls of the Blind. ***** Indian markets have been beset by a sudden wave of auditor resignations from listed companies in recent times. Stock prices of the affected companies have taken a beating. Runaway auditors have caused market participants to speculate over the next defection, as alpha monkeys smell quick gains. Auditor issues have surfaced after a period of widespread pri

Freudian Vulture Fallacy

“Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar .” - Sigmund Freud ***** CAN YOU SEE A VULTURE? "The Virgin and Child with St. Anne" by Leonardo da Vinci (1503) In a 1910 essay, Freud made a valiant attempt at divining an aspect of the painter Leonardo da Vinci’s personality through the above painting. Freud peered at the picture after tilting his head to the left, and noticed a vulture. Off went Freud on his psychoanalytic jet and concluded that the picture hid an insight into the painter’s life.  It seemed to speak volumes about da Vinci’s ‘homosexual’ childhood fantasy. Freud relied on a translation of da Vinci’s writings, apart from the painting, for his interpretation. Only the unforgiving arrow of time would pass true judgment on Freud’s mental frolics. The great man had mistranslated the word for ‘vulture’. The edifice on which Freud’s theory of da Vinci’s sexual fantasies rested was an illusion. Freud apparently considered the essay to be the on