Skip to main content

Book review: In the Long Run we are all Dead

In the Long Run we are all Dead: A Macroeconomics murder mystery
The US economy faces a deep recession, raging inflation and an impending run on the dollar. President Wedik likes economics as much as a fish likes land. Should he listen to the Keynesians, who favour government intervention or the Monetarists, who favour market fundamentalism?

Unable to decide, he delegates the tough decision to his Chief of Staff, Admiral Harcourt Green. Green laboriously goes through the process of coming up with an economic policy package...only to be mysteriously murdered on D-day. Details of the economic package dies with him...

Something has to be done soon to avoid an economic collapse. What? How?

Who committed the murder? And why?

The murder story could probably have been constructed better but the crux of the book is economics! Recommend it to those looking for a light read on macroeconomics without running the risk of drowning in jargon.

In this delightfully light read, Wolfson & Buranelli, weave macroeconomics lessons around a murder mystery. One is led through the age-old tussle between Keynesians and Monetarists, but the writers manage to engage the reader's interest amid the backdrop of the mysterious murder. The authors beautifully present the contradictions and trade-offs that perennially confront economic policy makers. The key take-aways are that policy-makers often are in no better position than market participants to predict the future path of an economy, and there is a large reflexive element at work in economies that, sadly, economists choose to ignore. Should policy makers listen to short-run focused Keynesians or long-run focused Monetarists? How does one strike a balance between the short and the long-run? Indeed, what is the short-run and long-run? Life is full of trade-offs. What's good for the short-run may not be for the long-run and vice versa.

Economic policy decision making is akin to steering a ship. Ever so often one gets caught in a storm and the ship wobbles as it hits wave troughs and crests. If the skipper steers forcefully in the opposite direction as the ship wobbles to one side, he runs the risk of over-steering if the wobble is temporary. On the other hand, if he does nothing and the wobble lasts longer, he runs the risk of imperiling the ship with his inaction.

Economic policy setting is a scientific art and achieving equilibrium is an Utopian dream. A dynamically evolving system calls for flexible policies that frequently set off unintended effects. Indeed, certain policy actions have damaging and long-lasting effects on the economy. The period of adjustment that the economy has to subsequently go through to undo the damage is painful (think Japan). Finally, fortune and randomness play a bigger role than anyone is willing to allow or admit.

"Chaos...is certainty."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Halls of the Blind

I can see what you see not Vision milky, then eyes rot. When you turn, they will be gone, Whispering their hidden song. Then you see what cannot be Shadows move where light should be. Out of darkness, out of mind, Cast down into the Halls of the Blind. 

- Diablo


I usually avoid referring to stuff from the 90s as the opening act. It risks giving away my vintage…
But the above words from one of the most successful role-playing games from the 90s – Diablo – (who remembers it?) is apt for this edition.
Auditor Problems.
It’s an opportune moment to dive into the Corporate Halls of the Blind.
*****
Indian markets have been beset by a sudden wave of auditor resignations from listed companies in recent times. Stock prices of the affected companies have taken a beating. Runaway auditors have caused market participants to speculate over the next defection, as alpha monkeys smell quick gains. Auditor issues have surfaced after a period of widespread price correction. Wounded consciences that were assuaged by …

The Strange Life of Abraham de Moivre

This edition is about a topic that fascinates me: bidding behaviour.
On how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. And the notion of ‘rationality’. *****  Many of you participated in a game I played with you recently. (I’m sure you are glad that I didn’t ask you to predict your expiry dates!)
An investment prospect offers 100% return potential over your benchmark return (your ‘required return’). How much of this excess return would you be willing to pay/share upfront to participate in the idea?
There were no right answers for this ‘buy in’. Only interesting answers.
Chart time.

Buyin for ‘50%’ represents 50% and above. Participants comprised of finance and non-finance backgrounds. The left bins generally had finance people; who opted for some variant of upfront fee and profit share structures. Many non-finance guys populated the higher bins. Interestingly, several finance folks populated the 50% and above bin. And I had some friends who were steadfast in populating the left mo…