Skip to main content

The Pig's resurrection

With many banks continuing to dance with death, there’s one bank that is smiling. The Pig’s.

The long period of declining savings rate – or an increase in consumer spending – was one of the reasons fuelling the boom that popped not-so-long ago. As over-indebted consumers look forward to an extended period of deleveraging, the US government hopes that with interest rates hovering close to 0%, consumers will be incentivized to borrow and jumpstart the Great Consumption story! Simultaneously, lending norms are gradually being tightened, stoking fears of rising defaults in the near term. The poor Fed can only encourage, but not compel, banks to lend. As consumers mend their profligate spending ways of the past, it looks difficult in the current environment to see either banks lining up to lend or consumers lining up to borrow.

Then there’s Bernanke-speak about keeping interest rates low for an ‘extended period’. With nominal rates close to 0% and inflation hovering around 2%, negative real rates of return do little to incentivize saving. The real return on US Treasury bills was >-2% in 2009. Consumers looking to save were penalized for indulging in frugality! The Fed desires consumers to spend at precisely the moment when they seem most ill-equipped to oblige.

So is current consumption a better option? Indeed the Fed and the economy would be happy if this were to happen. While the economic rationale for current spending sounds compelling, I don’t see it happening. High unemployment and the deleveraging cycle is likely to keep spending in check.

So if the consumption story is nearly dead and banks are unwilling to open their wallets, what will serve as the engine for future growth?

The Phoenix is not yet ready to rise from the ashes…

Comments

Anonymous said…
Love the pig! Great writing.

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange Life of Abraham de Moivre

This edition is about a topic that fascinates me: bidding behaviour.   On how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. And the notion of ‘rationality’.   *****  Many of you participated in a game I played with you recently. (I’m sure you are glad that I didn’t ask you to predict your expiry dates!)   An investment prospect offers 100% return potential over your benchmark return (your ‘required return’). How much of this excess return would you be willing to pay/share upfront to participate in the idea? There were no right answers for this ‘buy in’. Only interesting answers.   Chart time. Buyin for ‘50%’ represents 50% and above.     Participants comprised of finance and non-finance backgrounds. The left bins generally had finance people; who opted for some variant of upfront fee and profit share structures. Many non-finance guys populated the higher bins. Interestingly, several finance folks populated the 50% and above bin. And I had s

'CORN'y Connection

A common theme in investing is that, in the long-term, asset prices adhere to fundamentals. The road to adherence is often an irregular one, prices overshoot and undershoot along the way...but ultimately, they behave like obedient children. Sometimes though, the relationships between asset prices are hidden from the eye. Peer through the layers and one might just be able to come up with a relationship that could form the basis of a trading strategy. 'Corn'y Connection , is one such linkage... The Craze for Maize Lot of factors have driven corn (maize) prices of late. The rush of demand for et hanol has ensured that corn finally got its due. Apart from the fundamental factors of demand and supply, speculative demand for the commodity has served to increase the volatility in corn prices. Not surprisingly, corn prices have surged quite a bit (refer adjoining figure) . Along with the rise in corn prices, the 200-day historic volatility has increased significantly. Cor

Freudian Vulture Fallacy

“Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar .” - Sigmund Freud ***** CAN YOU SEE A VULTURE? "The Virgin and Child with St. Anne" by Leonardo da Vinci (1503) In a 1910 essay, Freud made a valiant attempt at divining an aspect of the painter Leonardo da Vinci’s personality through the above painting. Freud peered at the picture after tilting his head to the left, and noticed a vulture. Off went Freud on his psychoanalytic jet and concluded that the picture hid an insight into the painter’s life.  It seemed to speak volumes about da Vinci’s ‘homosexual’ childhood fantasy. Freud relied on a translation of da Vinci’s writings, apart from the painting, for his interpretation. Only the unforgiving arrow of time would pass true judgment on Freud’s mental frolics. The great man had mistranslated the word for ‘vulture’. The edifice on which Freud’s theory of da Vinci’s sexual fantasies rested was an illusion. Freud apparently considered the essay to be the on