Skip to main content

Long Volatility theme follow-up

One cannot prove an investment idea or theme 'right'. A better way is to take an idea and try to falsify it as much as possible. The 'best' investment idea/theme then is the one that best withstands the test of falsification. Lets see how the "Long-Volatility-Around-Elections" trade played out....


Volatility exploded and how! Through the election months of April and May-2009, market participants grew increasingly nervous on the election outcome, resulting in a volatility spike.

Volatility nearly doubled in the space of around two months. Long-volatility trades (straddles/strangles) worked out beautifully. Indeed some Long Straddles/Strangles nearly trebled in two months. While it is nearly impossible to time entry and exits to perfection, this theme would have resulted in an indecent return anyway!


Another addition to my Investment History notebook!

Time to stick my neck out. Where do we go from here? I can't see any significant volatility-expansion/compression story in the horizon. Is it time to go home? Not necessarily. Trending markets offer their own set of opportunities. But I have always found it tougher to take a call on market direction than to take a call on volatility.
...While its extremely tempting to do an "I-told-you-so", I see every investment idea/theme as a hypothesis that retains its credence till a structural shift renders the hypothesis obsolete. Then its time to formulate a new hypothesis and put it to the test!

Cautionary statement: There is immense risk of capital erosion in options trading. I strongly urge readers to steer clear of speculative activity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange Life of Abraham de Moivre

This edition is about a topic that fascinates me: bidding behaviour.   On how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. And the notion of ‘rationality’.   *****  Many of you participated in a game I played with you recently. (I’m sure you are glad that I didn’t ask you to predict your expiry dates!)   An investment prospect offers 100% return potential over your benchmark return (your ‘required return’). How much of this excess return would you be willing to pay/share upfront to participate in the idea? There were no right answers for this ‘buy in’. Only interesting answers.   Chart time. Buyin for ‘50%’ represents 50% and above.     Participants comprised of finance and non-finance backgrounds. The left bins generally had finance people; who opted for some variant of upfront fee and profit share structures. Many non-finance guys populated the higher bins. Interestingly, several finance folks populated the 50% and above bin. And I had s

Halls of the Blind

I can see what you see not Vision milky, then eyes rot. When you turn, they will be gone, Whispering their hidden song. Then you see what cannot be Shadows move where light should be. Out of darkness, out of mind, Cast down into the Halls of the Blind.  - Diablo I usually avoid referring to stuff from the 90s as the opening act. It risks giving away my vintage… But the above words from one of the most successful role-playing games from the 90s – Diablo – (who remembers it?) is apt for this edition. Auditor Problems. It’s an opportune moment to dive into the Corporate Halls of the Blind. ***** Indian markets have been beset by a sudden wave of auditor resignations from listed companies in recent times. Stock prices of the affected companies have taken a beating. Runaway auditors have caused market participants to speculate over the next defection, as alpha monkeys smell quick gains. Auditor issues have surfaced after a period of widespread pri

Freudian Vulture Fallacy

“Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar .” - Sigmund Freud ***** CAN YOU SEE A VULTURE? "The Virgin and Child with St. Anne" by Leonardo da Vinci (1503) In a 1910 essay, Freud made a valiant attempt at divining an aspect of the painter Leonardo da Vinci’s personality through the above painting. Freud peered at the picture after tilting his head to the left, and noticed a vulture. Off went Freud on his psychoanalytic jet and concluded that the picture hid an insight into the painter’s life.  It seemed to speak volumes about da Vinci’s ‘homosexual’ childhood fantasy. Freud relied on a translation of da Vinci’s writings, apart from the painting, for his interpretation. Only the unforgiving arrow of time would pass true judgment on Freud’s mental frolics. The great man had mistranslated the word for ‘vulture’. The edifice on which Freud’s theory of da Vinci’s sexual fantasies rested was an illusion. Freud apparently considered the essay to be the on